by T.L. Winslow (TLW)
Links to 10K+ stuck-on-stupid articles about the U.S.-Mexico problem since 2009. Read the long article after the posts to learn what the MMDS is all about.
Short form url of this page: http://tinyurl.com/megamergeblog
Wednesday, March 25, 2015
NYT: ‘JEALOUS,’ ‘HOARDING’ AMERICANS SHOULD LET IN 11 MILLION IMMIGRANTS—ANNUALLY
What a dishonest proposal. If it's such a great idea to allow Mexicans to cross the U.S. border at will, why doesn't it work the other way? Because the ever-corrupt govt. of Mexico treats Americans crossing into Mexico like dirt, relying on its racist fascist constitution to lock them out of all opportunities other than to spend their money on tourist traps. Meanwhile Mexico languishes locked in an ever-poor undeveloped economy that could be turned around with millions of "gringo" immigrants in just years.
The NYT has long snubbed my bipartisan Megamerge Dissolution Solution, a plan to annex Mexico as 10 new U.S. states to dissolve the border and permit mass BIDIRECTIONAL migration after the govt. and constitution of Mexico are dissolved and a 60-star U.S. flag flies over the new states. As long as that plan isn't on the table, proposals for unilateral migration are not only dishonest but contemptible. Look it up on the Web and read it seriously, then ask the NYT why it hasn't even mentioned it to disagree with it.
My reply:
ReplyDeleteWhat a dishonest proposal. If it's such a great idea to allow Mexicans to cross the U.S. border at will, why doesn't it work the other way? Because the ever-corrupt govt. of Mexico treats Americans crossing into Mexico like dirt, relying on its racist fascist constitution to lock them out of all opportunities other than to spend their money on tourist traps. Meanwhile Mexico languishes locked in an ever-poor undeveloped economy that could be turned around with millions of "gringo" immigrants in just years.
The NYT has long snubbed my bipartisan Megamerge Dissolution Solution, a plan to annex Mexico as 10 new U.S. states to dissolve the border and permit mass BIDIRECTIONAL migration after the govt. and constitution of Mexico are dissolved and a 60-star U.S. flag flies over the new states. As long as that plan isn't on the table, proposals for unilateral migration are not only dishonest but contemptible. Look it up on the Web and read it seriously, then ask the NYT why it hasn't even mentioned it to disagree with it.